Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $199.88 vs $299.95
- Up to 29% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-10600 - $1.21 vs $1.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i7-4820K - 176 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
165
93.75%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360822 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
71.17647058823529%
Price, $
$299.95
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
41.67194426852438%
Multi-Core
2440
39.51417004048583%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |