Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2433 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-4820K - 117 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $143.72 vs $199.88
- Up to 38% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-4820K - $1.23 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
101
86.32478632478633%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
62.121212121212125%
Price, $
$199.88
71%
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358249 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
39.68636911942099%
Multi-Core
2440
35.68294823047675%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |