Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2753 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-4820K - 126 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $160.68 vs $199.88
- Up to 35% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-4820K - $1.28 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 12 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
101
80.15873015873017%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
64.64646464646465%
Price, $
$199.88
80%
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358250 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
29.963570127504553%
Multi-Core
2440
28.0234294246009%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |