Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 953 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 1400 - 168 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $42.88 vs $549.95
- Up to 92% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-5930K - $0.26 vs $3.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.27/FPS
7.951070336391437%
Price, $
$549.95
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362877 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
163
97.02380952380952%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
949
82.09342560553632%
Multi-Core
3098
56.53284671532847%
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |