Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 365 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Celeron G3900 - 171 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $39.95 vs $549.95
- Up to 93% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-5930K - $0.24 vs $3.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
7.453416149068322%
Price, $
$549.95
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362907 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
95.90643274853801%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
50.259515570934255%
Multi-Core
992
18.1021897810219%
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |