Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4745 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Stray than Core i7-640LM - 189 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 32 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 25 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
