Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1603 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Athlon 3000G - 263 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $63.83 vs $150.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-6700 - $0.25 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
43.85964912280702%
Price, $
$150
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360857 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
252
95.81749049429658%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
74.0139211136891%
Multi-Core
1975
47.70531400966183%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |