Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 211 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $63.83 vs $115.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-9100F - $0.4 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Dirt 5 than Athlon 3000G - 180 vs 161 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
161
89.44444444444444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348919 minutes ago
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
69.65065502183407%
Multi-Core
1975
53.8293813028073%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |