Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1003 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Core i3-4130 - 707 vs 696 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $43.0 vs $108.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-6800K - $0.06 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361028 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
696
98.44413012729845%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
81.29084967320262%
Multi-Core
1960
34.62285815226992%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |