Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1430 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $108.0 vs $143.72
- Up to 16% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-10600K - $1.96 vs $2.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Core i7-6800K - 62 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
55
88.70967741935483%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349336 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
84.48275862068965%
Price, $
$143.72
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
73.8238841978287%
Multi-Core
5661
82.78736472652822%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |