Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 17% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 195 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $94.05 vs $143.72
- Up to 24% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-10600K - $0.56 vs $0.74 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
75.67567567567568%
Price, $
$143.72
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348856 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
85.64102564102564%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348856 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
71.17008443908324%
Multi-Core
5480
80.14039192746417%
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |