Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1518 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $108.0 vs $286.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10850K - $0.91 vs $2.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
119
95.19999999999999%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348971 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
39.737991266375545%
Price, $
$286
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
70.34482758620689%
Multi-Core
5661
62.236147757255935%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |