Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $108.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900F - $0.91 vs $1.85 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6800K - 130 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
119
91.53846153846153%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349104 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
49.189189189189186%
Price, $
$240
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
56.379548595117456%
Multi-Core
5661
61.727183513248285%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |