Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2310 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $108.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900K - $0.46 vs $1.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-6800K - 294 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
234
79.59183673469387%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349228 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
25.842696629213485%
Price, $
$522.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
41.156691324815064%
Multi-Core
5661
28.097081596188207%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |