Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1430 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $108.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10900K - $0.78 vs $3.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-6800K - 149 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
138
92.61744966442953%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
23.70820668693009%
Price, $
$490
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
69.9828473413379%
Multi-Core
5661
61.781076066790355%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |