Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1366 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3240 - 343 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $41.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6900K - $0.16 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
343
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
38.0952380952381%
Price, $
$145
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361560 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
249
72.59475218658892%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361559 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
44.24920127795527%
Multi-Core
1137
15.973588086541163%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |