Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2336 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-540 - 111 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $90.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-6900K - $0.92 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 73 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
70.22900763358778%
Price, $
$145
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361579 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
98
88.28828828828829%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361578 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
408
32.587859424920126%
Multi-Core
841
11.815116605788143%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |