Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2793 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $90.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 10% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $1.0 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-540 - 99 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
90
90.9090909090909%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354106 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
90.09009009009009%
Price, $
$109.99
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |