Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-750 - 125 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $75.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-6900K - $0.7 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
60.3448275862069%
Price, $
$145
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360810 minutes ago
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360809 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
34.105431309904155%
Multi-Core
1200
16.858668165214947%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |