Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1569 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - 120 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $145.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 58% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - $1.21 vs $2.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 130 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
112
93.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$2.86/FPS
42.30769230769231%
Price, $
$319.88
45%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
49.281150159744406%
Multi-Core
2299
32.29839842652431%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |