Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2026 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - 119 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $109.99 vs $319.88
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - $0.92 vs $2.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
112
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$2.86/FPS
32.167832167832174%
Price, $
$319.88
34%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348734 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348736 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
52.82534246575342%
Multi-Core
2299
39.67897825336555%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |