Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1518 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $145.0 vs $286.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10850K - $0.73 vs $1.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i7-6900K - 206 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
96.60194174757282%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
52.517985611510795%
Price, $
$286
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
71.95402298850576%
Multi-Core
7118
78.25417766051011%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |