Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $145.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900 - $1.21 vs $2.08 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - 130 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
92.3076923076923%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
58.17307692307692%
Price, $
$270
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
58.77934272300469%
Multi-Core
7118
80.73956442831216%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |