Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1236 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $145.0 vs $615.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900X - $0.79 vs $3.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6900K - 190 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 20 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
183
96.3157894736842%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348907 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.24/FPS
24.382716049382715%
Price, $
$615
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
79.44162436548223%
Multi-Core
7118
75.95774196990716%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |