Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 871 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $145.0 vs $468.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900K - $1.21 vs $3.77 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
96.7741935483871%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.77/FPS
32.09549071618037%
Price, $
$468
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
75.0599520383693%
Multi-Core
7118
89.42211055276383%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |