Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $145.0 vs $458.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-12900 - $3.09 vs $5.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 83% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-6900K - 86 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
47
54.65116279069767%
Value, $/FPS
$3.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348907 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.33/FPS
57.973733583489675%
Price, $
$458
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
50.62676910634857%
Multi-Core
7118
54.56915056731064%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |