Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1731 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G630 - 171 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $37.49 vs $145.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6900K - $0.25 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
29.411764705882355%
Price, $
$145
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361684 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
150
87.71929824561403%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361683 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |