Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 436 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 20% better in Cities: Skylines II than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 24 vs 20 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $270.0 vs $651.07
- Up to 50% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Core i7-6950X - $13.5 vs $27.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 24 vs 20 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
24
100%
Value, $/FPS
$27.13/FPS
49.76041282712864%
Price, $
$651.07
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349227 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
20
83.33333333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$13.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
90.65637065637065%
Multi-Core
6976
82.58553332544099%
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |