Buy on Amazon
$167
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 2674 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Core i5-750 - 58 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $75.0 vs $167.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-7700 - $1.74 vs $2.88 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.88/FPS
60.41666666666667%
Price, $
$167
44%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350012 minutes ago
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
43
74.13793103448276%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
30.74154067674586%
Multi-Core
1200
26.905829596412556%
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
