Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7820X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1107 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $375.0 vs $450.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $2.13 vs $2.38 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-7820X - 189 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 24 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
176
93%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$375
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280360 minutes ago
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |