Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1359 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i7-7820X - 213 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $150.0 vs $375.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-7820X - $0.7 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
201
94.36619718309859%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
37.4331550802139%
Price, $
$375
40%
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Single-Core
1411
66.49387370405277%
Multi-Core
7849
95.85979482169029%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |