Buy on Amazon
$375
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1485 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4570 - 121 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $70.0 vs $375.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-7820X - $0.59 vs $3.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.1/FPS
19.032258064516128%
Price, $
$375
18%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-7820X X-Series Processor 8 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348907 minutes ago
Core i5-4570
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
118
97.52066115702479%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-4570 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150 - Quad-core (4 Core) - 6 MB Cache
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Core i5-4570
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i5-4570 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
