Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $48.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-11900F - $2.09 vs $3.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 230% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-860 - 76 vs 23 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 16 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
23
30.263157894736842%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362110 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
66.13924050632912%
Price, $
$240
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
20.543528327959464%
Multi-Core
1463
15.952458837640387%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |