Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $48.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 79% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900KF - $0.32 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-860 - 183 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 20 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
151
82.5136612021858%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362177 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
20.64516129032258%
Price, $
$283.35
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
25.297787861599545%
Multi-Core
1463
15.982084334717065%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |