Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 144 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 9% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 186 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $270.0 vs $869.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-8700 - $1.59 vs $4.68 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.68/FPS
33.97435897435898%
Price, $
$869.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $869.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348501 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
91.39784946236558%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
77.59418374091209%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |