Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 3440 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $90.0 vs $155.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.77 vs $1.21 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-920 - 128 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
117
91.40625%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349773 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
63.63636363636363%
Price, $
$155
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349774 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
36.02430555555556%
Multi-Core
1434
29.621978929973146%
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |