Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3704 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $90.0 vs $112.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than Core i7-920 - 194 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-920 - $0.58 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280302 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |