Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 2772 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 4% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $90.0 vs $94.05
- Up to 3% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.3 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-920 - 307 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280311 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
307
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
96%
Price, $
$94.05
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |