Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2400G - 123 vs 117 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $135.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 64% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-9700F - $1.15 vs $3.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.17/FPS
36.277602523659304%
Price, $
$389.88
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348975 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
117
95.1219512195122%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
68.23757262750162%
Multi-Core
3294
52.653452685421996%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |