Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 136 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $109.99 vs $389.88
- Up to 71% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-9700F - $0.83 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
28.919860627177695%
Price, $
$389.88
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348849 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
97.79411764705883%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
75.40348612007747%
Multi-Core
5794
92.6150895140665%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |