Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 32% better in Starfield than Core i9-10900 - 83 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $216.23 vs $299.98
- Up to 45% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900 - $2.61 vs $4.76 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
75.90361445783132%
Value, $/FPS
$4.76/FPS
54.83193277310925%
Price, $
$299.98
72%
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349703 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$216.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $216.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349703 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1704
59.51798812434509%
Multi-Core
8421
65.75310377137504%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |