Buy on Amazon
$299.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1155 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 21% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 1700 - 63 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $195.0 vs $299.98
- Up to 21% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900 - $3.75 vs $4.76 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.76/FPS
78.78151260504202%
Price, $
$299.98
65%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349703 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
52
82.53968253968253%
Value, $/FPS
$3.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349704 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
58.97887323943662%
Multi-Core
5100
60.56287851799074%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
