Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 301 vs 293 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $244.77 vs $1075.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.81 vs $3.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
301
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349583 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
293
97.34219269102991%
Value, $/FPS
$3.67/FPS
22.070844686648503%
Price, $
$1075
22%
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349583 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Single-Core
1263
75.35799522673031%
Multi-Core
8338
98.9556135770235%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |