Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 249 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $244.77 vs $1150.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.98 vs $4.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 48 vs 20 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349582 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
239
95.98393574297188%
Value, $/FPS
$4.81/FPS
20.374220374220375%
Price, $
$1150
21%
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349583 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
73.68735083532219%
Multi-Core
7407
87.90647994303346%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |