Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 194 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $210.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $1.15 vs $2.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
45.45454545454545%
Price, $
$490
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348555 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
183
94.3298969072165%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348555 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1245
71.18353344768438%
Multi-Core
6113
66.71395831059696%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |