Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 2700 - 125 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $185.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900K - $1.57 vs $3.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.92/FPS
40.05102040816327%
Price, $
$490
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348537 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
118
94.39999999999999%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
63.693539165237276%
Multi-Core
5489
59.903961584633855%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |