Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900K - 134 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $373.59 vs $490.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900K - $2.79 vs $4.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 24 vs 20 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
84.32835820895522%
Value, $/FPS
$4.34/FPS
64.28571428571429%
Price, $
$490
76%
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353717 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$373.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $373.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353717 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1749
61.58450704225352%
Multi-Core
9163
52.029981261711434%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |