Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 157 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 3950X - 182 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $490.0 vs $515.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 3950X - $2.69 vs $2.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$490
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280173 minutes ago
Buy for $515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |