Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $283.35 vs $375.22
- Up to 8% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 9 5950X - $4.5 vs $4.87 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 22% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900KF - 77 vs 63 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
81.81818181818183%
Value, $/FPS
$4.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$283.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348323 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.87/FPS
92.40246406570841%
Price, $
$375.22
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1763
80.53905893101873%
Multi-Core
9154
75.28579652931985%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |