Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3470 - 195 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $69.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.4 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
27.586206896551722%
Price, $
$283.35
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348667 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
171
87.6923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
35.28077141236528%
Multi-Core
1840
20.100502512562816%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |